Back to policy
Social Protection / Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT)Download PDF
The heterogeneous impact of conditional cash transfers
Publication information
Region
Central America
Country
Honduras
Policy Area
Social Protection
Policy
Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT)
Authors
S Galiani; PJ McEwan
Year
2013
Full citation
Galiani, Sebastian, and Patrick J McEwan. “The Heterogeneous Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers.” Journal of public economics 103 (2013): 85–96.
View publication
View publication
Data
Secondary Data: 2001 Honduran Census data. Available at: https://geodata.mit.edu/catalog/nyu-2451-34924.
Ref. year
2013
Programme details
Programme name
Programa de Asignación Familiar (PRAF), or Family Allowances Program
Start / end date
2000-2002 (beginning and end of intervention).
Objectives
Improve health and education outcomes of poor families in Honduras.
Eligibility criteria
Children between 6 and 12 who were enrolled and regularly attending
grades 1 to 4 between the school year of February and November, up to the completion of the fourth grade. A health transfer of 644 Lempiras per year (about US$40) was available to children under 3 and pregnant mothers who regularly attended health centers. Households were eligible to receive up to 3 education transfers and up to 2 health transfers.
Intervention
During the two years of implementation, transfers were distributed in November 2000, May-June 2001, October 2001, and late 2002. The transfers were locally distributed as cash by PRAF personnel. In addition to CCTs, two kinds of direct
investments in schools and health centers were done. The education interventions consisted of payments of approximately US$4,000 per year, depending on school size, to parent associations in primary schools. The payments were conditioned on obtaining legal status and preparing a quality-improvement plan. The health interventions consisted of payments of approximately $6,000 per year to local health centers, depending on the client base. The health payments were conditioned on the formation of a health team (with members of the community and health personnel) and the preparation of a budget and proposal.
Evaluation details
Outcome variables
- Enrollment in school
- Child labour (household chores and outside the house)
Methodology
RCT
Design
Study design: to identify the experimental sample, 298 municipalities were ordered from lowest to highest values of the mean height-for-age z-score of first graders, obtained from the 1997 Height Census of First Graders. Seventy-three eligible municipalities had z-scores below a cut-off of −2.304. Of these, 3 were excluded because of distance and cost considerations, yielding a final sample of 70 municipalities.
Sample: The geographic concentration of child stunting produced a sample dominated by western Honduras. Three treatment groups and one control group were identified. G1 was to receive CCTs in education and health. G2 was to receive CCTs in addition to direct investments in education and health centers, while G3bwould receive only direct investments. G4 would receive no interventions. The 70 municipalities were divided into five quintiles of 14 municipalities, based on mean height-for-age. The random assignment occurred on October 13, 1999, during a public event. Within each quintile, 4 municipalities were randomly assigned to G1, 4 to G2, 2 to G3, and 4 to G4. The final sample consisted of 20 municipalities in G1, 20 in G2, 10 in G3, and 20 in G4.
Survey Instrument: The paper uses the 2001 Honduran Census, rather than the official evaluation data.
Sample: The geographic concentration of child stunting produced a sample dominated by western Honduras. Three treatment groups and one control group were identified. G1 was to receive CCTs in education and health. G2 was to receive CCTs in addition to direct investments in education and health centers, while G3bwould receive only direct investments. G4 would receive no interventions. The 70 municipalities were divided into five quintiles of 14 municipalities, based on mean height-for-age. The random assignment occurred on October 13, 1999, during a public event. Within each quintile, 4 municipalities were randomly assigned to G1, 4 to G2, 2 to G3, and 4 to G4. The final sample consisted of 20 municipalities in G1, 20 in G2, 10 in G3, and 20 in G4.
Survey Instrument: The paper uses the 2001 Honduran Census, rather than the official evaluation data.
Evaluation results
Results summary
Eligible children were 8 percentage points more likely to enroll in school and 3 percentage points less likely to work with the implementation of the Honduran PRAF experiment. The effects were much larger in the two poorest strata, and statistically insignificant in the other three (the latter finding is robust to the use of a separate regression-discontinuity design). Heterogeneity confirms the importance of judicious targeting to maximize the impact and cost-effectiveness of CCTs.
Form of exploitation
Child Labour
Affected group
Households
Location
National
Result on Child labour
Eligible children were 3 percentage points less likely to work with the implementation of the Honduran PRAF experiment.
Other results
Eligible children were 8 percentage points more likely to enroll in school with the implementation of the Honduran PRAF experiment.
Notes
There is no consistent evidence of effects on ineligible children or adult labor supply