Back to policy
Social Protection / InfrastructureDownload PDF
Information and Communications Technology, Agricultural Profitability and Child labour in Rural Peru
Publication information
Region
South America
Country
Peru
Policy Area
Social Protection
Policy
Infrastructure
Authors
DW Beuermann
Year
2015
Full citation
Beuermann, Diether W. “Information and Communications Technology, Agricultural Profitability and Child Labor in Rural Peru.” Review of Development Economics 19.4 (2015): 988–1005. Web.
View publication
View publication
Data
Secondary Data: Peruvian Living Standards Measurement Survey (PLSMS) and Peruvian National Household Survey (ENAHO). Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (Nasa). FITEL’s administrative information contains the GPS location of each phone and the date at which the phone became operative. Data is not available online.
Ref. year
2015
Programme details
Programme name
N. A.
Start / end date
2001-2004 (beginning and end of rollout)
Objectives
The program consisted in providing at least one public payphone to each targeted rural village in Peru. The paper examines the impact of providing public payphones among isolated villages in rural Peru to identify the effects of information and communication technology (ICT) on agricultural profitability and child labor.
Eligibility criteria
The 6296 targeted villages situated across rural Peru had not any kind of phone services (either fixed lines or mobile coverage) before the intervention, so these payphones were the first opportunity for villagers to communicate with the rest of the country without having to physically travel.
Intervention
The intervention was carried out by the Peruvian Fund for Investments
in Telecommunications (FITEL), which provided at least one public (satellite) payphone between the years 2001 and 2004 to each of the 6296 targeted villages situated across rural Peru. None of these villages had any kind of phone services (either fixed lines or mobile coverage) before the intervention, so these payphones were the first opportunity for villagers to communicate with the rest of the country without having to physically travel. According to FITEL’s documents, the intervention reduced the average distance from any rural village in Peru to the nearest communication point from 60 to 5 kilometers.
Evaluation details
Outcome variables
- Enrollment in School
- Engagement in any combination of school and work (work in agriculture or others)
Methodology
Difference-in-difference
Design
Study design: the author exploits differences in the timing of the intervention across villages to identify the impacts of payphones on agricultural profitability and the utilization of child labor, after showing that these differences in timing were orthogonal to the baseline levels of the outcomes. This intervention occurred in places where neither mobile phones nor fixed-line phones were available. The treated villages were located in zones where mobile phone coverage was technically and economically unfeasible. The satellite technology
implemented did not require villages to possess fixed lines or electrical supply to enjoy the service. Therefore, phone placement only followed the criteria of being provided to villages without prior access to ICT. This, coupled with differences in timing for phone placement that were uncorrelated with baseline characteristics, allows us to identify the impacts of interest using a panel of intervened villages.
Sample: the sample includes only villages situated within a radius of 30 minutes of traveling time to the nearest phone (the mean travel time in the final sample is 6 minutes). Then, within these villages, we only
focused on households that reported both agricultural production and agricultural costs. Our final sample consists of 15,242 household-year and 15,501 children (6–13 years old)-year observations, distributed across 2453 village-year observations. The difference between the intervention timing patterns provided by the sample and the overall program timing is statistically indistinguishable from zero.
Survey Instrument: The first data source is the Peruvian Living Standards Measurement Survey (PLSMS) for the years 1997 and 2000, succeeded by the Peruvian National Household Survey (ENAHO) for the years 2001–2007. The ENAHO replaced the PLSMS and most of their questionnaires mimic those of the PLSMS ones. Both surveys are nationally representative. These surveys contain information on demographics, education, income, and expenses.
implemented did not require villages to possess fixed lines or electrical supply to enjoy the service. Therefore, phone placement only followed the criteria of being provided to villages without prior access to ICT. This, coupled with differences in timing for phone placement that were uncorrelated with baseline characteristics, allows us to identify the impacts of interest using a panel of intervened villages.
Sample: the sample includes only villages situated within a radius of 30 minutes of traveling time to the nearest phone (the mean travel time in the final sample is 6 minutes). Then, within these villages, we only
focused on households that reported both agricultural production and agricultural costs. Our final sample consists of 15,242 household-year and 15,501 children (6–13 years old)-year observations, distributed across 2453 village-year observations. The difference between the intervention timing patterns provided by the sample and the overall program timing is statistically indistinguishable from zero.
Survey Instrument: The first data source is the Peruvian Living Standards Measurement Survey (PLSMS) for the years 1997 and 2000, succeeded by the Peruvian National Household Survey (ENAHO) for the years 2001–2007. The ENAHO replaced the PLSMS and most of their questionnaires mimic those of the PLSMS ones. Both surveys are nationally representative. These surveys contain information on demographics, education, income, and expenses.
Evaluation results
Results summary
The income shock that resulted from the intervention was translated into a reduction in the share of children that combine work with school equivalent to 36%. This reduction translated into an increase in the share of children fully dedicated to the school by 32%.
Form of exploitation
Child Labour
Affected group
Households
Location
Local
Result on Child labour
The income shock that resulted from the intervention was translated into a reduction in the share of children that combine work with school equivalent to 36%.
Other results
The program has led to an increase in the share of children fully dedicated to the school by 32%.
Notes
The positive adult labor supply effects were consistent with a substitution for lower child labor utilization. The likelihood of being engaged only in school was affected more heavily for boys than for girls (20 vs 14 percentage points). Impacts within the age range of 6–9 years old are evenly distributed between boys and girls, but for the age range 10–13 years old, boys show stronger effects than girls.