Back to policy
Social Protection / Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT)Download PDF

Can Conditional Cash Transfers Compensate for a Father’s Absence?

Publication information

Region
Latin America
Country
Colombia
Policy Area
Social Protection
Policy
Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT)
Authors
Emla Fitzsimons and Alice Mesnard
Year
2013
Full citation
Fitzsimons, E. and A. Mesnard. Forthcoming. “Can Conditional Cash Transfers Compensate for a Father’s Absence?” World Bank Economic Review.
View publication
Data
-
Ref. year
2013

Programme details

Programme name
Familias en Acción
Start / end date
Not discussed in this paper, but based on Attanasio et al. (2010): 2001-ongoing
Objectives
Not discussed in this paper, but based on Attanasio et al. (2010): To alleviate long-run poverty by fostering the accumulation of human capital among children living in indigent households and reduce current poverty through the transfer payment
Eligibility criteria
Not discussed in this paper, but based on Attanasio et al. (2010): Implementation in 622 ‘municipalities’ in 26 ‘departments’ selected by Fondo de Inversiones para la Paz (FIP) on the basis of the following four criteria: 1) the municipality had to have access to basic education and health infrastructure; 2) the municipality had to have at least one bank; 3) the municipality had to have fewer than 100,000 inhabitants and not be the capital of a regional district and not be in the coffee region that received special help as a consequence of the 1995 earthquake; 4) the local authority had to register the municipality to the programmeme and provide a number of documents, including the lists of ‘SISBEN1’ (a basic welfare indicator more or less routinely collected for all families in Colombia) beneficiaries. All families registered with ‘SISBEN1’ in December 1999 in the targeted municipalities, and with children aged 0-17 years, were potential beneficiaries of the programmeme.
Intervention
Not discussed in this paper, but based on Attanasio et al. (2010): The programmeme, implemented in rural areas, consists of conditional subsidies for investments into education, nutrition, and health. The nutrition component consists of a basic monetary supplement that is given to all beneficiary families with children aged less than 7 years. The health component consists of a vaccination and growth and development checks for children, and of courses on nutrition, hygiene and contraception for their mothers. Participation in this part of the programmeme is necessary in order to receive the nutritional supplement. With respect to the education component, subsidies, paid to the mother of the child(ren), are granted conditional on the child(ren) attending at least 80% of school classes. The amounts of the subsidy are 14,000 pesos (US$6.15) and 28,000 pesos (US$12.30) for children attending primary and secondary school, respectively.

Evaluation details

Outcome variables
  • School Enrollment: a dummy taking the value 1 if the child was enrolled at the time of the survey
  • Work as main activity: a dummy taking the value 1 if the child’s main activity in the week before the survey is reported to be work, household chores (paid and unpaid), or look for work.
Methodology
Difference in difference
Design
Sample: The final evaluation sample is made up of 122 municipalities, out of which 57 are treatment (phased in over two waves) and 65 are controls. In each municipality, approximately 100 eligible households were randomly sampled.
Identification strategy: Random allocation of the programme was not feasible, so for the purpose of the study it was decided to construct a representative stratified sample of treatment municipalities and to choose control municipalities among those that belonged to the same strata, were similar to treatment municipalities in terms of population, area, and quality of life, but that were excluded from the programme. The impact of the programme is estimated by using a difference-in-differences methodology combined with matching.
Survey: Baseline data collection was conducted between June and October 2002. A first wave of follow up data collection was collected one year later and a second wave of follow-up data was collected in 2006. Given the fact the in some municipalities the programme started before the baseline, the questionnaire included a number of retrospective modules in order to construct ‘pre-programme’ measurements for a large number of variables.

Evaluation results

Results summary
The authors show that departure of the father (due to death or divorce) decreases children’s school enrolment by around 5 percentage points, and increases child work by 3 percentage points. These detrimental effects of the departure of the father are largely offset by the cash transfer scheme. The authors provide extensive checks to show that children and households where the father does and does not leave are comparable in terms of baseline characteristics, pre-baseline trends in schooling and income, and attrition rates.
Form of exploitation
Child Labour
Affected group
Households
Location
National
Result on Child labour
The departure of the father (due to death or divorce) increases child work by 3 percentage points. This detrimental effect of the departure of the father is largely offset by the cash transfer scheme.
Other results
The departure of the father (due to death or divorce) decreases children’s school enrolment. This detrimental effect of the departure of the father is largely offset by the cash transfer scheme.
Notes
-